Laps in the Pattern
Flight instructors are no strangers to the traffic pattern. To develop our students’ skills, we coach them through as many landings as we can. Closed circuits in the traffic pattern are a common way to cram plenty of landings into a tight block of time. As a student prepares to solo it’s not uncommon to see 8, 10, or more landings performed in a single flight. The objective is to drill the landings repeatedly to help the student get better. But, what if we’re getting this all wrong?
Desirable Difficulties
Practicing a single skill set repeatedly in a single session is referred to as “block” practice. This is what we do when we spend most or all of a flight lesson in the pattern or practicing the same maneuver multiple times. Research by Elizabeth and Robert Bjork of UCLA suggests this isn’t the best way to learn. While block practice may appear to produce quicker gains in performance, the improvement doesn’t last. In fact, the Bjork’s have discovered many common practice strategies – some used in flight training – may actually degrade our long-term learning in favor or short-term performance boosts.
So, what’s happening? A crucial difference exists between learning and performance. When we are learning best, our performance will appear poor. Conversely, when we are performing well, we aren’t likely learning much. Learning is a cognitively intense activity, where performance is more of a replay of skills already learned. So, if you are performing well, you’re not learning much new. To promote better learning, the Bjorks recommend introducing “desirable difficulties” to shift your brain back into learning mode and promote better long-term development.
Interleaving
The Bjorks have developed four major strategies for creating desirable difficulties. In earlier articles we discussed variation, spacing, and retrieval. Today we’ll look at “interleaving” which is essentially the opposite of block practice. Instead of practicing a single skill set over and over again, interleaving involves moving from one skill to another during a practice session. When we make lap after lap in the traffic pattern practicing multiple landings in a row, that’s block practice. Interleaving would be performing a landing or two early in the flight, then heading to the practice area to work on slow flight or other maneuvers before going back to practice another couple of landings.
If you are performing well, you’re not learning much new.
Forgetting is the Thing
You might be thinking, “if I interrupt my practice with other tasks, won’t I forget some of what I learned?” Yes. This is the main reason interleaving seems counter-intuitive. We lose some of the progress gained during the practice session. If we go practice skill B after we started with skill A, then we’ll forget some of what was learned of skill A by the time we come back to it. That, it turns out, is exactly the point.
Elizabeth and Robert Bjork argue that forgetting a little bit (and having to relearn) is what makes this such a powerful tool for long-term progress. By making your brain work harder during practice you are earning a boost in long-term progress and superior performance. This is why you’re more likely to remember facts committed to memory if you practice recalling them after some time has passed. Of all the desirable difficulties, the disconnect between short-term performance and long-term learning is perhaps the most obvious with interleaving.
Using the Skill
So, if the basic idea is to break up practice blocks by inserting other learning tasks, how do we put this to use in flight training? Here are some possibilities out of a virtually endless list:
Ground Practice
- If practicing for a knowledge test, mix up the questions so you don’t have 5 or 6 questions on the same topic area in row.
- Practice performing weight and balance and performance calculations as part of a larger flight planning task rather than just drilling multiple weight and balance problems back to back.
- Recite memory items in several short sessions while doing other learning tasks in between.
Flight Practice
- If a lesson plan calls for practicing 3 maneuvers, move through all three before repeating any of them (I suspect this is less useful if the maneuvers are brand new to a student.)
- Simulate engine failures in different phases of flight and under different conditions, within the bounds of safety of course.
- Where practical, separate similar maneuvers or procedures with others that aren’t related. Don’t try to do more than one thing at a time but practice several things consecutively rather than repeating the same task over and over.
Conclusion
Interleaving and the other desirable difficulties are based on the idea that increasing the challenges of learning in positive ways can promote better long-term learning and retention. These ideas seem counter-intuitive because the increased difficulty may appear to slow progress. It is important to remember that short-term performance and long-term learning are not linked, and what helps one likely hurts the other. By focusing on long-term learning and stepping up the difficulty of practice in meaningful ways, pilots will be better able to apply the skills in the future when it really counts. What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments below.
This is good; and I have comments.
1) This is such basic, “flight training 101” that I’m surprised we even have to talk about it, let alone have PHD psychologists study it and proclaim it as something revolutionary.
2) It’s called “Flight Training” not “Flight Learning” for a reason. Training involves learning but also includes adaptation, psychomotor/Cognition integration, and many other elements. Training is very different than pure learning. You can learn from a book, but it takes training to fly airplanes. Training does involve repetitive practice. How many reps? Two or three is optimal, beyond that is a waste of time, just as the distinguished authors say. But I and other inexperienced CFI’s understood that very well 25 years ago.
Hi Charles, thank you so much for your comment. I agree this is basic stuff, and these particular PhDs have been championing these ideas for many decades. Unfortunately the ideas seem to be lost somewhat within the industry. I’ve only been teaching since 2001, but even then the movement to make flight training “easier” and “more efficient” seemed well under way. I think the unintended effects of trying to make flight training more accessible and cost effective has been a dumbing down of complex topics and teaching-to-the-test rather than real training. This article is an attempt for me (one of many) to try and flesh out what I think is missing in flight training these days. My hope is this will encourage everyone to look at how they train and put some thought into it. I appreciate your many posts in the flight training groups on Facebook. Thanks for taking the time to read and comment! — B.J.